The AS presents its first-ever Replication Prize — to the jury’s knowledge, the first replication award in the social sciences worldwide — to Dr. Sergio Lo Iacono (Essex and Utrecht) together with Wojtek Przepiorka (Utrecht), Vincent Buskens (Utrecht), Rense Corten (Utrecht), Marcel van Assen (Utrecht and Tilburg) und Arnout van de Rijt (European University Institute). The award honors “The Competitive Advantage of Sanctioning Institutions Revisited: A Multilab Replication” (PNAS Nexus, 2023). The jury — Nicole Kapelle (Dublin), Heinz Leitgöb (Leipzig), Ulrich Kohler (Potsdam), and Richard Traunmüller (Mannheim) — commends this study for its methodological rigor, theoretical significance, and exemplary transparency. It sets a benchmark for replication practice in sociology and reminds us that true scientific progress depends not only on novelty, but on reliability, openness, and verification. The paper exactly replicates the 2006 influential Science experiment by Gürerk, Irlenbusch & Rockenbach (wurde (Gürerk Ö,Irlenbusch B, Rockenbach B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. 2006. Science. 312(5770):108–111) testing whether peer-sanctioning institutions have a competitive advantage over sanction-free environments. When individual and collective interests are in conflict, individuals face a social dilemma whereby cooperation will lead to higher collective benefits but acting selfishly will produce higher individual benefits. Oftentimes, individuals facing such dilemmas may join and subject themselves to institutions that promote cooperation. The replication probes the sustainability of peer-sanctioning institutions in fostering cooperative behaviours across seven European labs with N = 1,008 participants; the replication was preregistered with open data/code/materials. Under peer sanctioning, if sufficient individuals are willing to incur the costs of punishing uncooperative behaviours, then, cooperators fare better than noncooperators. However, peer sanctioning can effectively promote cooperation only if groups that practice it can thrive in competition with groups that do not. The replication study shows that, across different populations, groups with peer sanctioning consistently outgrow and outperform groups without peer sanctioning. The AS Replication Prize: Replication is a vital element of sound and credible science, yet it rarely receives the recognition it deserves. The AS Replication Prize seeks to change this by honouring studies that make outstanding contributions to the verification of sociological research results through reproduction, reanalysis, replication, or adversarial collaboration Honorable mention. An honorable mention goes to Corinna Lewitzky (University of Leipzig) for her reproduction/replication of Pollmann-Schult (2008) on fatherhood and men’s preferred working hours. Replications created in 2025 and 2026 can be submitted for the next AS award in 2027.
“Latest developments and news”
In this section you can find selected public statements by social scientists and reports on current questions of analytical-empirical sociology that have been published in different media formats.
EN 










